Donald Trump’s lawyers and Democrats arguing for his removal from office clashed on Tuesday over the powers of his office, as the president’s legal team echoed his allegations about the House investigation that led to his impeachment.
House Intelligence Committee chairman Adam Schiff used his lengthy opening statement to warn senators to resist transforming Mr Trump into “a monarch” by allowing him to set the terms of a trial that will determine whether he is ousted from the Oval Office. But White House counsel Pat Cipollone responded on the first day of Mr Trump’s impeachment trial by alleging House Democrats put forth “fraudulent” evidence and “have no case.”
The president and his legal team spent the historic day – he is only the third sitting US chief executive to face a Senate impeachment trial – trying to discredit the evidence gathered by House Democrats during the investigation late last year that ended with a mostly party line vote to impeach him on counts of abusing his power and obstructing Congress.
Mr Trump for months described the House probe as a shady “hoax” held in the bottom floor of the Capitol, eager to plant seeds of doubts in the minds of the few voting blocs that will determine whether he wins a second term in November. Mr Cipollone, for instance, hit House Democrats for holding their investigation “in secret.”
Both sides used ample parts of their opening statements to debate whether witnesses should be called during the upper chamber’s proceeding. Mr Trump has said he would invoke executive privilege to block the testimony of current and former White House aides, including acting chief of staff Mick Mulvaney and former National Security Adviser John Bolton. (Bolton has said he would testify if issued a subpoena. One of his former aides, Fiona Hill, told House lawmakers during a public impeachment hearing last year Bolton once referred to what Mr Mulvaney and US ambassador to the European Union Gordon Sondland wanted from the Ukraine government as a “drug deal.”)
Jay Sekulo, one of the president’s attorneys, continued team Trump’s argument that the House Democratic impeachment managers, if senators side with them and oust the 45th president, would essentially be eroding the constitution. That’s because, he said, the office of the president’s “assertion of privilege is backed by decades of precedent.”
Mr Sekulo sounded a lot like Mr Trump when he contended House Democrats opted to impeach the president because they remain offended he was elected three years ago.
“Why are we here? Are we here because of a phone call or are we here before this great body because since the president was sworn into office there was a desire to see him removed?” Mr Sekulo said, calling the impeachment probe “re-insurance” and an “umbrella policy” after the Russia election meddling probe led by former Special Counsel Robert Mueller failed to bring down Mr Trump’s presidency.
Using executive privilege has been “utilised by presidents since the founding” of the country, Mr Sekulo said, adding it exists to “protect the constitution and the separation of powers.”
But in no way did Mr Trump’s attorneys parrot their boss more so than in the top White House lawyer’s contention about November’s presidential election.
“They’re not here to steal one election, they’re here to steal two elections,” said Mr Cipollone, in one of his first public statements since becoming the White House’s top attorney.
But Mr Schiff argued the opposite, saying the president’s “conduct … would have alarmed the founders.”
Senate majority leader Mitch McConnell has said he is working in lock step with the White House’s legal team. Mr Schiff alluded to Mr Trump’s influence over the chamber’s rules for the proceeding, saying it would mean any commander in chief “cannot be indicted, cannot be impeached.”
“It makes him a monarch,” the California Democrat said as senator sat silent in accordance with the chamber’s guidelines for an impeachment trial.
Earlier on Tuesday, Mr McConnell – under pressure – made several changes to the trial rules he penned and Democrats had sharply planned.
Opening arguments will still span 48 hours – 24 for each side – but now they could last up to three days rather than being jammed into just two. The Kentucky Republican also changed course by altering his rules resolution to automatically include the entire package of evidence the House used to impeach Mr Trump into his chamber’s trial.
For his part, White House aides with Trump at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, said he is receiving regular briefings about the goings-on on the Senate floor. Shortly after leaving a working dinner at that forum, the president sounded a now-familiar refrain.
“READ THE TRANSCRIPTS!” the president tweeted, referring to a White House-prepared summary of his July 25 telephone call with Ukraine’s president in which Democrats say he linked investigations of US Democrats to a massive military aide package Kiev expected in its continued standoff with Russia and its larger and more sophisticated military. That line is part of the Trump side’s argument that he broke no laws and did nothing wrong.
Robert Bauer, a New York University School of Law professor and a former White House counsel under President Barack Obama, calls that contention “mistaken.”
“The federal campaign finance law bars soliciting anything of ‘value’ from a foreign national to influence a federal, state and local election,” he wrote on the Lawfare blog. “Whether the solicitation was made and ‘value’ received depends on the facts—facts with which Mr Dershowitz claims he has no intention of engaging.”
The Senate is expected to vote on Democratic amendments aimed at forcing the White House to clear witnesses and submit documents Tuesday night or early Wednesday morning. Senators are expected to vote those down, while approving Mr McConnell’s rules for the trial.
January 22, 2020 at 03:08AM John T Bennett